MIPS / MACRA Quality Reporting

Quality reporting is complex and the penalties are real. We manage MIPS measure selection, tracking, and submission so you maximize your score — and your incentive payments.

We select the Quality, Promoting Interoperability, and Improvement Activities measures that best fit your specialty and your existing workflow, not just whichever are easiest to report, because measure selection is where most of a MIPS score is won or lost. Your projected score is visible year-round rather than estimated in December, which gives you time to actually course-correct before final data submission and attestation instead of hoping for the best.

A lot of MIPS underperformance isn’t a quality-of-care problem — it’s a measure-selection and data-completeness problem, where a practice reports on measures that don’t reflect what they actually do well, or submits incomplete data because tracking started too late in the year. We treat measure selection as a strategic decision made in January, not a data-entry task done in December.

This service is relevant for any MIPS-eligible clinician, but it’s most valuable for smaller practices without a dedicated quality-reporting staff member, where measure selection and year-round tracking would otherwise fall to whoever has time between patients.

If your MIPS score has been mediocre for a couple of years running, or you find out your final score at the same time CMS does, that’s a sign measure selection and tracking are happening too late to actually influence the outcome.

Instead of a scramble in the fourth quarter, measure selection happens at the start of the year based on what fits your specialty and workflow, and you get regular visibility into your projected score so there’s still time to adjust if something’s off track.

MIPS performance and value-based performance overlap more than most practices realize — a lot of what strengthens your MIPS quality category also supports value-based care performance, since both reward the same underlying documentation discipline.

Our standard is no surprises at submission time — if your projected score isn’t where it should be, that’s a conversation we have with you in July, not something you find out about from a CMS notice next year.